My older daughter, Hannah, was almost five on 9/11. I had
tried hard to keep bad influences from her. The worst of the bad influences, to
my way of thinking, were Raffi, the singer of insipid children’s songs, and
Barney, the dinosaur most in need of extinction. Musically, I raised her on a
diet of Peter, Paul & Mary, the Beach Boys, and the Beatles: music that
wasn’t jarring but yet was fulfilling. I sang her to sleep with gentle,
kid-friendly songs by legitimate writers, such as Kenny Loggins’ “House at Pooh
Corner”, Paul Williams’ “Rainbow Connection”, and Bob Thiele’s “What a
Wonderful World”. On nights when she outlasted my usual repertoire, I sang a
lentissimo version of Boston’s “More Than a Feeling.”
But there was only so much I could do. At school, she
learned Raffi’s “Baby Beluga”; from classmates, she found out about Barney.
Though as she grew older we shared a love of singing soundtracks from musicals
such as Grease, Wicked, and Hairspray, as
a teenager she has become an avid listener of top 40 stations, and the strains
of Rihanna, Eminem, Lady Gaga, Brittney Spears, Pink, Bruno Mars, et al,
comprise the sum total of her listening interests.
Unintentionally but perhaps not without reason, I had a
second daughter, Stella, 10 years after Hannah was born. Once again, I tried to
manage her exposure to popular culture. But just as Hannah grew up faster than
did girls of my generation, Stella is growing up even faster than Hannah. I
never even got to the Beatles with Stella. She wants to listen to what her
sister listens to. And so she has become, at the tender age of
six, a fan of Justin Bieber.
Though she hasn’t asked for a Justin Bieber backpack, she
has pointed out with some degree of envy a classmate decked out in full
Bieberphile gear. And on a recent trip to the library, Stella insisted we
borrow the Bieber documentary Never Say Never. I insisted she watch it with
headphones on. She insisted I watch it with her. Because I love my daughter, I
didn’t refuse her. But now I wish I had, though not for the reason you might
think.
I remember years ago when Marilyn Manson was all the rage –
and I do mean rage. Everywhere he performed, there were protests. Many of his
shows were cancelled because local parents and authorities thought there would
be violence or some kind of satanic ritual. I hadn’t heard Manson’s music and
being apathetic to the whole situation, I tended to side with the censors, assuming
there was nothing particularly worthwhile with his music anyway. Then I
happened to catch a newsmagazine show in which the Manson mania was being
investigated. I saw him, heard him, saw clips of his performance, and said,
“Oh, he’s just updating the Alice Cooper thing. Completely harmless
entertainment. Those parents and authorities are idiots.”
The same sort of thing attended any thoughts I may
previously have had about Justin Bieber. That his music is not made for me is
obvious, but his type – the young white teenybopper playing bubble gum love
songs to young girls on the cusp of puberty – is something that comes along
every generation. In my own youth, the role had been filled by the likes of
David Cassidy, Donny Osmond, Leif Garrett, Andy Gibb, and Shaun Cassidy. At the
worst, these teen idols were responsible for some exceedingly disposable pop
music (and, I must admit, the occasional guilty pleasure, such as the Partridge
Family’s “Echo Valley 2-6809”).
At their best, however, I always thought such music was a
gateway drug of sorts. Before young girls got fascinated by the teen idols,
they probably had little interest in music, little awareness for how a song can
touch you and speak to you, little understanding that a musician can add
meaning to your entire existence. People always outgrow their teen idols. But
they don’t outgrow their passion for music. Having heard it plenty lately, I
now realize that there’s not such a great gulf between Bieber’s “U Smile” and
Journey’s “Lights”. A sappy ballad transcends ages and genres.
So I sat and watched Never Say Never with Stella. I’m glad it was more documentary than concert film, as I learned a lot about him. He seems to have had a natural talent for music, learning drums, guitar, and piano at a young age. He also seems to have always been extraordinarily charismatic, with no fear of standing out in a crowd and expressing himself. His truly meteoric success is not the result of an obnoxious, pressuring mother but his own deeply felt calling to be a performer. I can respect all that.
As a superstar, he seems pretty down to earth, still wanting
to do the things that kids his age do. His entourage is quite diverse in terms
of race, age, and gender, and he appears to have close relationships with
everyone around him. His voice is still too young not to grate on my nearly
half-century-old ears, and his music is indeed as lightweight when listening
closely to it as it seems when trying to ignore it. But he’s very likable and
there’s very little apparent pretense. The enormity of his success is as
staggering as the fact that he’s really just a cute kid who can sing and dance
a bit. He doesn’t pretend to be more than that and he’s not marketed as being
much more than that.
To my great embarrassment, there is a sequence in the film
that moves me to tears. It begins with his agent and manager walking around
towns on show dates, looking for where young girls are congregating. They
approach and say they’re with the Bieber tour, asking if they’re going to the
show. When they find real fans with no tickets, they give them some. And not
just teens and tweens; a disappointed mother who feels she let down her
daughter explodes in teary gratitude when handed the ducats. I don’t exactly
know why this should make me cry, but I think it’s something about my feelings
of inadequacy, based on my income and life situation, in providing for my
children the special things they deserve and desire.
These scenes are followed by a song called “One Less Lonely
Girl” that becomes an interesting experience in concert. When he begins the
song, Bieber’s people go out in the crowd and select a suitably cute and
emotional girl to be the title character. Towards the end of the song, the girl
is brought out to sit on a stool at center stage. Bieber comes out from the
side of the stage, singing. He is handed a bouquet of long-stem red roses,
which he presents to the girl and proceeds to circle her, singing only to her,
occasionally touching her face and stroking her arm as she sobs into her hand.
Rather than being jealous, the crowd eats this up and when the girls return to their
seats, their friends hug them tightly. One girl all but screamed through her
tears, “I just love him so much!”
Again, I’m not sure why it makes me cry, but it does make me
realize just what Justin Bieber is: he’s a dream-maker. He’s made his own dreams
come true, and he does the same for his audience. To me, that’s what being an
artist is all about. His music may fall well short of any moderate aesthetic
standards, and he may not have the depth of spirit of an artist, but he’s doing
his job which is the job of the artist: to inspire, to heal, to enable the
listener or the viewer to transcend the immediate reality and be propelled into
the world of dreams. Now, I can’t do everything for my children, but I’ll be
damned if I’ll jeer from the sidelines when someone is doing that for them,
whether it’s Justin Bieber or even a dumb-ass purple dinosaur.
7 comments:
I feel your pain. I saw the Justin Bieber movie when it first came out in a theatre full of 12-year old girls and their moms. During the "I love him so much!" outburst you mentioned, I burst out laughing. Ruby glared at me and punched me in the arm. I could the echo of tween outrage gasps and maternal giggles reverberate throughout the theatre.
I hate to have to tell you this, but don't you think you're being too overprotective of your kids?
Mr. Rubin, I know you love your kids very much, and you want nothing but the best for them, but in my opinion, you should have waited until Hannah was ten, then introduced her to the old music (from the 60s and 70s). You should have let your kids have a normal childhood. Oh well, the past is the past.
R's work is not insipid!!! You're so mean...
>:(
I am positive that if you were CANADIAN, you would think of R differently than you do know. Oh, you Americans...
Jason, wake up! If you think Raffi's recordings are not very good at you, at least take a look at this website:
www.childhonouring.org
Oh, and when I said, "Wake up," it means "you don't know what you're missing!"
Post a Comment